Sunday, December 18, 2016

A632.5.5.RB_Protected Values in Decision Making




 Protected Values

     The first protected value that I wrote about was human rights. I just feel that as humans, simply because we were born on this earth, we have basic rights and anyone wishing to violate those rights should be punished. We all have a right to life. A right to live with dignity, freedom, equality, justice, and peace. No one should be violated because they think something different than someone else, that is simply wrong. No one has the right to walk up to me and take something that is mine, nor do they have the right to harm me. I have a right to be on this planet and live the life that is mine, just as everyone else has the same right and for someone to try and take even a piece of that away from me makes me very angry. However, it happens every day, more often than I’m even aware. I would be willing to do whatever I needed to do in order to protect those rights, even if it meant sacrificing my own life so that those rights are protected. 

     My second protected value was animal rights. I don’t feel that they should have the same rights as us because that’s just crazy, but they are a living being that can feel pain and happiness. Most of the time animals are defenseless when it comes to us humans and that just makes it even worse when a human harms an animal. I understand that some animals are here for our food consumption, but that does not mean that they have to be treated horribly, or tortured. I live in Alaska where hunting moose, bear, and other animals is vital for their survival. The families live only off the meat they hunted. They use every last bit of the animal so that nothing goes to waste. They do not hunt for sport and they don’t hunt more than they need. I understand that side of things, but what I don’t understand is the people who beat, starve, or kill their dogs. People who are just cruel for one reason, because they can. That, is unacceptable. In my concept map the animal rights was geared more towards animal testing; however, the same concept still applies. I would go through extreme lengths to protect this right; however, with this one I do have limits. I only say that because if I am forced to choose between my family and an animal, I will have to choose my family. 

     The third protected value I have is the deforestation that is taking place all over the world. To me, this one is just plain common sense. Our forests are natural resources and when a natural resource is gone, it is gone forever, it does not replenish itself. A lot of corporate men only see the trees as undeveloped land and they see it as their job to get it developed. Now, I am not your “tree-hugger” type who believes that trees have feelings and such; I am more practical. The facts of the matter are, that the forests they are killing having species living in them where we get a most of our medicines from. For heaven’s sake, trees is what makes our oxygen!  If we don’t have trees we have more carbon dioxide which equals human extinction. I would go to great lengths to protect this value, but it too has limits on how far I would be willing to protect it. I only say that because if protecting it would put my family in harm’s way then I would not. 

     These values would completely affect my decision-making process and I would be completely biased when it comes to the decision. If there was a decision that I was faced with that was in complete contradiction to the values I have, I would make my decision based on my personal values.

No comments:

Post a Comment